How to Calculate Free Cash Flow: SaaS FCF Formula Guide
Learn to calculate free cash flow (FCF = OCF - CapEx) with real 2025 SEC filing data from Adobe, Zoom, Snowflake, and Intuit. Discover why ZM's 41.7% FCF margin beats Adobe, how Snowflake generates positive FCF despite $1.35B net loss, and why Intuit's quarterly FCF swings 7x between tax seasons.
Last Updated: January 20, 2026 (FY2025/Q3 2025 data) • Next Update: April 2026 (after Q4 2025 earnings)
TL;DR: The FCF Formula That Actually Matters
Free Cash Flow = Operating Cash Flow - Capital Expenditures
| Company | OCF | - CapEx | = FCF | FCF Margin |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adobe | $2,198M | $72M | $2,126M | 35.5% |
| Zoom | $516M | $8M | $508M | 41.7% |
| Intuit | $637M | $38M | $599M | 15.4%* |
| Snowflake | $138M | $24M | $114M | 9.4% |
*Intuit Q1 only—tax season Q2 is 7x higher. ZM's 41.7% margin beats ADBE's 35.5% due to ultra-low 0.7% capex intensity.
Why Free Cash Flow Matters More Than Earnings
Every investor learns about earnings per share (EPS). Fewer understand the metric that actually determines shareholder returns: free cash flow.
Here's the reality most investors miss:
- Snowflake lost $1.35 billion in net income (TTM) but generated $114 million in positive FCF
- Zoom generates 41.7% FCF margin—higher than Adobe's celebrated 35.5%
- Intuit's quarterly FCF swings 7x between tax season and off-season
Net income can be manipulated through accounting choices. Depreciation schedules, revenue recognition timing, and accruals all affect reported earnings. Cash flow cannot be faked. Money either comes in or it doesn't.
This guide teaches you to calculate FCF using real 2025 SEC filing data, then reveals the analytical insights that separate sophisticated investors from the crowd.
The FCF Formula: Step-by-Step
Basic FCF Formula
Free Cash Flow = Operating Cash Flow - Capital Expenditures
FCF Margin Formula
FCF Margin = Free Cash Flow ÷ Revenue
This tells you what percentage of each revenue dollar converts to cash available for shareholders.
Worked Example 1: Adobe — "The Gold Standard"
What you'll learn: How a mature SaaS company converts nearly all revenue to cash, setting the benchmark for the industry.
Adobe Q4 FY2025 FCF Calculation
Step 1: Find Operating Cash Flow From Adobe's FY2025 10-K (filed January 15, 2026):
"Cash flows from operations of $10.03 billion during fiscal 2025 increased by $1.98 billion, or 25%"
Q4 Operating Cash Flow: $2,198 million
Step 2: Find Capital Expenditures Q4 CapEx: $72 million
Step 3: Calculate FCF
FCF = $2,198M - $72M = $2,126M
Step 4: Calculate FCF Margin Q4 Revenue: $5,989 million
FCF Margin = $2,126M ÷ $5,989M = 35.5%
TTM Numbers:
- FCF: $9.6 billion
- FCF Margin: 41.4% (TTM includes Q1-Q3 at ~43% margin; Q4's 35.5% pulled it down)
- FCF Trend (Q.TREND8): +4.8% (margin expanding)
Worked Example 2: Zoom — "The FCF Margin Surprise"
Conventional wisdom is wrong. Zoom's 41.7% FCF margin beats Adobe's 35.5%. The data challenges assumptions about which SaaS company is the cash flow champion.
Zoom Q2 FY2026 FCF Calculation
Step 1: Operating Cash Flow From Zoom's Q2 FY2026 10-Q (filed November 25, 2025):
"Free Cash Flow increased to $1,585.6 million from $1,392.5 million" (9-month)
Q2 Operating Cash Flow: $516 million
Step 2: Capital Expenditures Q2 CapEx: $8 million
Step 3: Calculate FCF
FCF = $516M - $8M = $508M
Step 4: Calculate FCF Margin Q2 Revenue: $1,217 million
FCF Margin = $508M ÷ $1,217M = 41.7%
The Analytical Insight Most Miss
ZM's FCF margin exceeds ADBE's. Why?
| Metric | Zoom | Adobe | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|
| FCF Margin Q | 41.7% | 35.5% | ZM +6.2pp |
| CapEx as % Revenue | 0.7% | 1.2% | ZM |
| Gross Margin | 77.6% | 89.3% | ADBE |
Adobe has higher gross margins, but Zoom's ultra-low capital intensity (0.7% vs 1.2%) means more of each operating dollar flows through to shareholders.
The lesson: FCF margin isn't just about operating efficiency—it's about capital intensity. Pure software (Zoom) can beat software + physical infrastructure (Adobe) on cash generation.
Worked Example 3: Snowflake — "When Growth Doesn't Mean Cash"
The paradox every growth investor must understand: Snowflake lost $1.35 billion but generated positive FCF. Here's why—and what it means for your analysis.
Snowflake Q3 FY2026 FCF Calculation
Step 1: Operating Cash Flow Derived from FCF + CapEx (OCF not directly stored for Q): Quarterly OCF: $138 million (derived)
Step 2: Capital Expenditures Q3 CapEx: $24 million
Step 3: Calculate FCF
FCF = $138M - $24M = $114M
Step 4: Context from Filings
"Consumption-based revenue model provides flexibility for customers but creates less visibility into revenue timing compared to traditional subscriptions."
The SNOW Paradox Explained
| Metric | Value | What It Means |
|---|---|---|
| Net Income TTM | -$1.35 billion | Massive GAAP loss |
| FCF Q | +$114 million | Positive cash generation |
| Cash Conversion | -0.65x | Meaningless (negative denominator) |
How can a company lose $1.35B but generate positive cash?
Stock-based compensation (SBC) is the answer:
- SBC flows through the income statement as an expense → creates net loss
- SBC adds back to operating cash flow → doesn't consume cash
- Result: Positive FCF despite negative net income
The actionable insight: For unprofitable growth companies, FCF tells you if the business model works on a cash basis. Net income is distorted by non-cash SBC. Snowflake's positive FCF means the core business generates cash—the accounting loss is a function of how employees are paid.
Warning signs despite positive FCF:
- FCF Margin Trend (Q.TREND8): -33.4% (margin collapsing)
- Revenue growth: 29% (slowing from prior periods)
- This trajectory suggests future cash flow stress
Worked Example 4: Intuit — "Why Seasonality Destroys Single-Quarter Analysis"
The 7x swing: Intuit's Q2 FCF is $4,360M. Q1 is $599M. Same company, adjacent quarters, 7.3x variance. Here's why this matters for every seasonal business you analyze.
Intuit Q1 FY2026 FCF Calculation
Step 1: Operating Cash Flow From Intuit's Q1 FY2026 10-Q (filed November 20, 2025): Q1 Operating Cash Flow: $637 million
Step 2: Capital Expenditures Q1 CapEx: $38 million
Step 3: Calculate FCF
FCF = $637M - $38M = $599M
Step 4: Compare to Q2 (Tax Season) Q2 Operating Cash Flow: $4,395 million Q2 CapEx: $35 million
Q2 FCF = $4,395M - $35M = $4,360M
The Seasonality Evidence
| Quarter | FCF | FCF Margin | What's Happening |
|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 (Aug-Oct) | $599M | 15.4% | Off-season |
| Q2 (Nov-Jan) | $4,360M | 56.2% | Tax season peak |
| Variance | 7.3x | +40.8pp | Working capital timing |
From Intuit's 10-Q:
"Due to the seasonal nature of our TurboTax and ProTax offerings, they typically generate minimal revenue in our first fiscal quarter compared with our second and third fiscal quarters."
Why This Happens
The mechanism is working capital timing:
- TurboTax customers file and pay during Q2 (January-April filing season)
- Operating costs are spread throughout the year
- Q2 sees massive cash collection; Q1 sees minimal
- Result: 7.3x FCF variance between adjacent quarters
The critical lesson: Never judge a seasonal business on single-quarter FCF. Use TTM or annual figures only.
Intuit TTM FCF: $6.4 billion (32.9% margin)—a much more accurate picture than any single quarter.
SaaS FCF Comparison: The Full Picture
| Company | FCF Q | FCF TTM | FCF Margin Q | CapEx % | Key Teaching |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Adobe | $2,126M | $9,599M | 35.5% | 1.2% | Mature benchmark |
| Zoom | $508M | $1,845M | 41.7% | 0.7% | Capex efficiency wins |
| Intuit | $599M* | $6,393M | 15.4%* | 1.0% | Seasonality trap |
| Snowflake | $114M | N/A | 9.4% | 2.0% | Growth ≠ cash |
*Intuit Q1 only—not representative of annual performance.
The Capex Efficiency Spectrum
All four companies spend less than 2% of revenue on capital expenditures:
| Company | CapEx Q | Revenue Q | CapEx % | Meaning |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zoom | $8M | $1,217M | 0.7% | Pure software |
| Intuit | $38M | $3,886M | 1.0% | Service platform |
| Adobe | $72M | $5,989M | 1.2% | Creative cloud |
| Snowflake | $24M | $1,212M | 2.0% | Cloud infrastructure |
The insight: For SaaS companies, FCF ≈ OCF. The formula (FCF = OCF - CapEx) becomes almost trivial because CapEx is immaterial. The real analytical work is understanding operating cash flow drivers.
Common FCF Calculation Mistakes
1. Forgetting CapEx Sign Convention
CapEx appears as a negative number in cash flow statements (cash outflow). When calculating FCF, subtract the absolute value:
FCF = $2,198M - (-$72M) ✗ WRONG
FCF = $2,198M - $72M ✓ CORRECT
2. Ignoring FCF Trends
Point-in-time FCF hides the trajectory:
- Adobe FCF margin trend: +4.8% (expanding)
- Intuit FCF margin trend: -0.8% (stable)
- Snowflake FCF margin trend: -33.4% (collapsing)
The trend often matters more than the current level. See the worked examples above for how seasonality (Intuit) and growth dynamics (Snowflake) affect single-quarter interpretation.
Methodology and Data Sources
All data sourced from SEC EDGAR filings:
| Company | Filing | Filed Date | Age |
|---|---|---|---|
| Adobe | FY2025 10-K | 2026-01-15 | 5 days |
| Zoom | Q2 FY2026 10-Q | 2025-11-25 | 56 days |
| Snowflake | Q3 FY2026 10-Q | 2025-10-31 | 81 days |
| Intuit | Q1 FY2026 10-Q | 2025-11-20 | 61 days |
Metrics computed by MetricDuck:
- FCF = net_cf_ops - capex
- FCF Margin = fcf / revenues
- Trend calculations use Q.TREND8 (8-quarter linear regression slope)
Limitations:
- Seasonal businesses (Intuit) require TTM analysis
- Snowflake's OCF Q derived from FCF + CapEx due to data structure
- FCF margin trends may not persist
Related Resources
- Earnings Quality: Complete Framework — Broader cash flow quality analysis
- FCF vs Earnings: Cash Conversion Framework — Why FCF and net income diverge
- Cash Flow Quality Analysis — OCF/NI ratio deep dive
MetricDuck Research
CFA charterholders and former institutional equity analysts building financial intelligence you can trust.